\relax 
\citation{James2001}
\citation{Ashburn1990}
\citation{Leibfried1996}
\citation{Poya1996}
\citation{Klose2001}
\citation{Chuang1998_2}
\citation{Smithey1993}
\citation{Kurt1997}
\citation{Drobny2002}
\citation{Stokes1852}
\citation{James2001}
\citation{Haffner2004}
\citation{Steffen2006}
\citation{Stevenson2006}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\numberline {2}Methods}{20}}
\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2.1}Introduction}{20}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2.2}Quantum state tomography}{20}}
\citation{Haffner2004}
\citation{James2001}
\citation{MikeandIke}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2.1}Properties of the density matrix}{23}}
\newlabel{DensityMatrixProperties}{{2.2.1}{23}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2.2}Measuring the density matrix}{23}}
\newlabel{rho_in_phi_basis}{{2.2}{24}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{Linear inversion}{25}}
\newlabel{measurement_outcome_in_phi_basis}{{2.3}{25}}
\citation{DataAnalysisBriefBook}
\newlabel{matrix_expectation_values_as_a_function_of_density_matrix}{{2.8}{26}}
\newlabel{PMrho}{{2.11}{26}}
\citation{DataAnalysisBriefBook}
\newlabel{eq:least_squares}{{2.14}{27}}
\citation{deMartini2001}
\citation{Eisenberg2004}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{Error analysis}{28}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2.1}{\ignorespaces Measured rate of coincident photon events in a 200 ms window from Type-I SPDC source. The rates are very well fit by a Poissonian distribution centered at 26.21.}}{29}}
\newlabel{fig:Poissonian_statistics}{{2.1}{29}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2.3}The positivity constraint}{30}}
\citation{DataAnalysisBriefBook}
\citation{James2001}
\citation{DataAnalysisBriefBook}
\citation{James2001}
\citation{Kosut2004}
\citation{James2001}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2.4}Maximum-likelihood estimation}{31}}
\citation{Kosut2004}
\citation{Sturm1999}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{The likelihood function}{32}}
\citation{Kosut2004}
\newlabel{eq:likelihood}{{2.26}{33}}
\newlabel{eq:log-likelihood}{{2.28}{33}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2.5}An example: Two-photon polarization density matrix}{34}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2.1}{\ignorespaces Laboratory data for the closest state to $\frac  {1}{\sqrt  {2}}\left (\mathinner {|{HH}\delimiter "526930B }+\mathinner {|{VV}\delimiter "526930B }\right )$ that we can make. The projections column gives the measurements performed on the two photons, the counts column gives the measured number of coincidence counts. The frequencies column gives that number of counts normalized to the total number of counts measured for that basis.}}{35}}
\newlabel{tab:tomo_measurements}{{2.1}{35}}
\citation{Bell1964}
\citation{Clauser1969}
\citation{Freedman1972}
\citation{Aspect1981}
\citation{Burnham1970}
\citation{Hong1987}
\citation{Steinberg1992}
\citation{Kwiat1995}
\citation{Kwiat1999}
\citation{Kwiat1999}
\citation{Weihs1998}
\citation{White1999}
\citation{Pan2001}
\citation{Zhao2004}
\citation{Pan2001}
\citation{Pan2000}
\citation{Walt2005}
\citation{OBrien2004}
\citation{Lanyon2007}
\citation{Santori2002}
\citation{McKeever2003}
\citation{Li2005}
\citation{Chou2004}
\newlabel{eq:sample_dm}{{2.32}{36}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2.3}Experimental state estimation}{36}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3.1}Spontaneous parametric downconversion}{37}}
\citation{Boyd1965}
\newlabel{eq:energy_conservation}{{2.33}{39}}
\newlabel{eq:momentum_conservation}{{2.34}{39}}
\citation{Kwiat1995}
\citation{Take2001}
\citation{Kwiat1993}
\citation{Rarity1990}
\citation{Groblacher2007}
\citation{Kwiat1995}
\citation{Kwiat1999}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3.2}Polarization-entangled SPDC sources}{41}}
\citation{White1999}
\citation{Altepeter2005_1}
\citation{Mosley2008}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3.3}Real-world sources}{42}}
\citation{Hong1987}
\citation{Kwiat1999}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3.4}Type-I sandwich source}{43}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{Longitudinal walkoff}{43}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2.2}{\ignorespaces Measured spectrum of 405 nm pump laser. Centre frequency is found to be 404.8 nm with a full-width at half maximum bandwidth of 0.5 nm.}}{44}}
\newlabel{fig:405nm_laser_spectrum}{{2.2}{44}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{Transverse walkoff}{45}}
\citation{Altepeter2005}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2.3}{\ignorespaces Plot of the measured non-local phase $\phi $ in $\frac  {1}{\sqrt  {2}}\left (\mathinner {|{HH}\delimiter "526930B }+e^{i\phi }\mathinner {|{VV}\delimiter "526930B }\right )$ against iris position. The linear dependence is expected due to the transverse walkoff experience by downconversion from the first crystal in the second crystal.}}{47}}
\newlabel{fig:phase_versus_iris_position}{{2.3}{47}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2.4}{\ignorespaces Plot of the measured concurrence against the diameter of the two collection apertures. The theory is calculated based on the measured phase dependence from figure 2.3\hbox {}. The discrepancy indicates that some other iris diameter-independent decoherence mechanism is also playing a role.}}{48}}
\newlabel{fig:entanglement_versus_aperture}{{2.4}{48}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{Alignment of two crystals}{49}}
\citation{Barbieri2008}
\citation{Dragan2004}
\citation{Clauser1969}
\citation{Aspect1981}
\citation{Clauser1969}
\citation{James2001}
\citation{Resch2008}
\citation{Adamson2007}
\citation{Shalm2008}
\citation{Mitchell2004}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3.5}Source output}{51}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3.6}Type-II beam-like emission source}{51}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2.5}{\ignorespaces CHSH measurements. Half-waveplates are placed in front of polarizers at detectors A and B. The different curves are for waveplate A at angles $0^\circ $, $22.5^\circ $, $45^\circ $ and $67.5^\circ $ degrees (effectively creating a polarizer at the angle $\alpha $ in the legend). The $x$-axis gives the angle of waveplate B. The value the curves at angle $11.25^\circ $ and $33.75$ can be used to calculate the CHSH S-function. The high visibility of $90\%$ for $\alpha =\pm 45^\circ $ is indicative of a Bell's inequality violation.}}{52}}
\newlabel{fig:sample_bell_measurements}{{2.5}{52}}
\citation{Take2001}
\citation{Kurtsiefer2001}
\citation{Ling2008_2}
\citation{URen2007}
\citation{Cova1996}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2.4}Photon detection}{53}}
\citation{SPCMDatasheet}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2.6}{\ignorespaces Spectral response curve for Perkin-Elmer single-photon counting module}}{54}}
\newlabel{fig:detector_spectral_response}{{2.6}{54}}
\citation{Hong1987}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.4.1}Coincidence detection}{55}}
\citation{BornWolf}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2.5}Polarization manipulation}{57}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.5.1}Polarization projection}{57}}
\newlabel{fig:calcite_polarizer}{{2.7(a)}{59}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:calcite_polarizer}{{(a)}{59}}
\newlabel{fig:dielectric_polarizer}{{2.7(b)}{59}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:dielectric_polarizer}{{(b)}{59}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2.7}{\ignorespaces Comparison of calcite and dielectric polarizers. The unequal transmission of left and right circular light for the dielectric polarizer is difficult to correct for in a polarization analysis system.}}{59}}
\newlabel{fig:comparing_polarizers}{{2.7}{59}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2.6}Polarization rotators}{59}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.6.1}Waveplates}{60}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.6.2}Motorized rotation stages}{60}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2.8}{\ignorespaces Plot showing the effect of the waveplate losing $5^\circ $ of angle over $360^\circ $ of travel. Note that the intensity at $-135^\circ $ differs noticeably from that at $225^\circ $ and the best-fit sine curve leads the data for low angles and lags for large angles.}}{61}}
\newlabel{fig:bad_wp}{{2.8}{61}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.6.3}Calibration}{62}}
\newlabel{eq:waveplate_equation}{{2.36}{63}}
\citation{Meadowlark_catalogue}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.6.4}Liquid crystal waveplates}{65}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2.9}{\ignorespaces Plot showing the coincidence rate of horizontally polarized SPDC photons while a voltage was applied to a LCWP with its axis at $45^\circ $ to the pump polarization. The $x$-axis gives the peak-to-peak voltage of a 2KHz square wave applied across the liquid crystal.}}{67}}
\newlabel{fig:LCWP_data}{{2.9}{67}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.6.5}Liquid crystal waveplate driver}{67}}
\citation{MikeandIke}
\citation{MandelandWolf}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2.7}Polarization analysis}{68}}
\citation{James2001}
\citation{Altepeter2005}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2.10}{\ignorespaces Rise and fall times for LCWP waveplate transmission when a step voltage is applied and removed. The fall time is longer because the liquid crystal must relax back to the equilibrium state.}}{69}}
\newlabel{fig:LCWP_timing}{{2.10}{69}}
\citation{Steinberg1993}
\citation{Steinberg1992}
\citation{Bouwmeester1997}
\citation{OBrien2004}
\citation{Pan2000}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2.2}{\ignorespaces Settings for polarization analysis with waveplates}}{70}}
\newlabel{tab:polarization_analysis_settings_4}{{2.2}{70}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2.3}{\ignorespaces Settings for polarization analysis with LCWPs}}{71}}
\newlabel{tab:polarization_analysis_settings}{{2.3}{71}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2.8}Two-photon interference}{71}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.8.1}Alignment}{71}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{Iris scanning}{72}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2.11}{\ignorespaces Measured rate of coincidences as the delay in one input arm of the HOM interferometer is scanned}}{74}}
\newlabel{fig:hom_scan}{{2.11}{74}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.8.2}Dips and antidips}{74}}
\citation{Kim2006}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.8.3}Crystal walkoff}{75}}
\newlabel{fig:antidip}{{2.12(a)}{76}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:antidip}{{(a)}{76}}
\newlabel{fig:antidip_visibility}{{2.12(b)}{76}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:antidip_visibility}{{(b)}{76}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(a)}{\ignorespaces {A Hong-Ou-Mandel antidip with a visibility of 55\%}}}{76}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(b)}{\ignorespaces {Visibility of the Hong-Ou-Mandel antidip as a function of vertical iris position. the sinusoidal variation is analogous to the standing-wave interference seen in a misaligned Mach-Zehnder interferometer}}}{76}}
\newlabel{fig:dips_displaced_plot}{{2.8.3}{77}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2.12}{\ignorespaces Plot of HOM visibility versus beamsplitter location}}{77}}
\newlabel{fig:dips_displaced_diagram}{{2.8.3}{78}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2.13}{\ignorespaces Diagram explaining the dependence of HOM visibility on beamsplitter location. The horizontal photons walk off in the crystal that generates vertical photons. This leads to a displacement in the location of the minimum dip visibility as the beamsplitter is scanned horizontally.}}{78}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.8.4}Type-II apparatus}{78}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2.9}Summary}{79}}
\@setckpt{chapter2}{
\setcounter{page}{80}
\setcounter{equation}{41}
\setcounter{enumi}{3}
\setcounter{enumii}{0}
\setcounter{enumiii}{0}
\setcounter{enumiv}{132}
\setcounter{footnote}{5}
\setcounter{mpfootnote}{0}
\setcounter{part}{0}
\setcounter{chapter}{2}
\setcounter{section}{9}
\setcounter{subsection}{0}
\setcounter{subsubsection}{0}
\setcounter{paragraph}{0}
\setcounter{subparagraph}{0}
\setcounter{figure}{13}
\setcounter{table}{3}
\setcounter{parentequation}{0}
\setcounter{subfigure}{0}
\setcounter{lofdepth}{1}
\setcounter{subtable}{0}
\setcounter{lotdepth}{1}
}
